So there is really no good way to adjust that segment so that it fits better with the rest of the sentence. When this happens, and we want to write our thoughts and words in the order they occur to us, we can use a dash. This does not occur with any great frequency, but it can now and then.Īlso, when we speak, our thoughts don't always occur to us in a way that can easily cause us to say a sentence that has a continuous, logical, and correct grammatical flow. We do this with dashes to add something to the middle of a sentence, as well, that does not follow with the grammatical flow of the sentence. We use dashes, sometimes, to add something to a sentence that doesn't follow with the grammatical structure or flow. This horrible use of the English language is sickening. And they definitely do not always speak intelligently. It just goes to show that "educated people" don't always write intelligently. That's very strange for a professional journalist who writes articles for a well-known news outlet. He has a hard time with English grammar and a hard time with vocabulary usage. So the writer here just doesn't know what he's talking about. Obviously, Trump gave Obama's afternoons on the golf course attention, and he was critical of this. What was this writer even thinking about if he was thinking at all?ĭismissive tells us he thought it was not worthy of consideration or attention. The fact of the matter is that Trump was not dismissive of them. Trump would (or might) not come under such criticism had he not been so dismissive of Obama's afternoons on the golf course.Įven the condition clause doesn't make any sense at all. Therefore, to keep this as a mixed conditional, we have to use would or might. In first place, the result clause is something imaginary or contrary to reality. The guy who wrote this article must have been seriously distracted. It has to be "might not have come under such criticism" or "would not have come under such criticism". I hope we don't have to learn what they mean and their actual severity anytime soon.That sentence is wrong. In modern times those words and their meanings have been so diluted that we don't remember their cost. They understood why treason and sedition were not to be fucked with. I am not big on the constitution but, our founding father's lived in scrappier times. Keep in mind if he loses the election he still has the other options on the table. Attempt to overthrow the country by force (again), incite a civil war (Putin would be oh so proud) and get in with the secessionists, or make the government fear him so much that they delay and he can "win" the election. If he can create enough unrest, with foreign aid (Russia, etc), BEFORE those charges even come, it'll make the DOJ who has been struggling to get the courage to do anything for years now to buckle/delay. He knows the J6 and other charges are coming next - those would stick and be far worse then whatever happens from this. You can bet he has loyalists in the DOJ as well. Reported FBI timidity in the Donald Trump classified documents investigation is concerning, but Justice Department prosecutors’ actions are reassuring. In Mar-a-Lago probe, prosecutors reportedly stood strong against FBI worries They tried to bully prosecutors into letting it go But the thing to understand about Donald Trump’s legal troubles is that they exist not because federal agents are out to get him, but despite the fact that the FBI is full of Trump supporters who would really like to leave him alone. The way conservatives tell it, the Federal Bureau of Investigation is a hive of anti-Trump villainy, filled with agents looking for any excuse to hound the former president with investigative witch hunts. The FBI Desperately Wants to Let Trump Off the Hook
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |